It may be true that there’s value in eating mercury-rich fish, but it would be better to eat mercury-poor fish,” says Hammitt. “There are benefits to eating fish, and there’s nothing good about having methylmercury in them. Chronic low-level exposure to methylmercury has also been shown to impair brain function. At very high exposures, this can lead to fatigue, muscle weakness, and dizziness and damage organs like the kidneys and liver. Generally speaking, depending on the amount of consumption, fish like swordfish, shark, and certain kinds of tuna-large fish that eat a lot of smaller fish-have higher levels of methylmercury (the only form of mercury to bioaccumulate in the human body). ![]() The FDA has documented which species of fish, on average, have the highest levels of mercury. Omega-3 fatty acids can help protect against heart disease, reduce inflammation, and improve organ health, among other things. In fact, fish are often considered the healthiest protein one can eat, particularly because of nutrients like vitamin D and selenium. ![]() The Current FDA Recommendations of Mercury in FishĮating fish has significant benefits. Hammitt, program director of Environmental Health Risk: Analysis and Applications, the risk analysis isn’t as simple as avoiding fish entirely-in fact, people are ultimately missing out on key nutrients when taking that approach. Should you stop, or drastically reduce, eating fish to avoid mercury? Depending on what you read or watch on TV, the answers might be contradictory. Share this: Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Reddit
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |